Walk to Justice

(pic from Malaysiakini.com)

Today was an historic day. Voices echoed round Putrajaya. Ground shook. Hearts moved. Something has started.

I participated in the Malaysian Bar-organised “Walk to Justice” march in Putrajaya. About 2000 people (mainly lawyers) were gathered at the steps of the Palace of Justice, to march to the Prime Minister’s office to submit a memorandum to Cabinet on the independence of the Judiciary.

Two memorandums were submitted, one to demand a Royal Commission be set up to inquire after the appointment of the current Chief Justice, Tun Fairuz, after the recent controversial video clip was released. The second was to urge the setting up of an independent Judicial Selection Committee. (yes, the current appointment of judges is not done in an open, transparent manner…)

We gathered at 10am (I was there early, and thought that there may be more FRU police members than participants in the gathering, thank goodness I was wrong). The crowds starting trickling in at 11am, mainly dressed in penguin suits, black and white, the lawyer colours. I followed suit.

By 11.30am, we realised that the 7 buses carrying the lawyers from Bar Council were missing – the police had stopped them from entering Putrajaya from the main road itself. They eventually had to walk 5km just to reach us at the Palace of Justice itself. Kudos to them!

The walk was wonderful. There was an energy pulsating throughout the crowd, seeing the blacks and whites walking in cohesion together in throngs, under the cool morning sky. Weather was perfect, not harsh at all, as we walked calmly amidst honking cars (and a bus too!) that gave us support and thumbs up. Only visual intimidation was apparent through FRU trucks and policemen on alert, plus a hovering helicopter above us. (Some imagined that they were the ones doing cloud-seeding to make the rain come!)

Reaching the premises and lawn of the PM’s office, I remarked that we were treading upon the Prime Minister’s garden – the response to which was, “This is being paid for by us, the people.” – in true activist spirit.

Waiting for the Bar Council’s office bearers to return from their sojourn within the royal rooms of the PM, the crowd (in dignity) shouted various responses like, We want justice… and I indignantly said “Malaysians” to the “Who are we?” calls. Because, it is all Malaysians who want justice – not just lawyers. Plus, I am representing the public, the citizen, the people.

Thunder rolled and the rain came tumbling down in large, cool drops. And the people stood firm, many getting soaked in the process. Protest banners were inverted as umbrellas, and many other mini umbrellas popped up that were originally to prevent the sun’s harsh rays from tanning our already brown skin. (Little crowds of black and whites gathered in “kelompok” at the foot of the humongous flag poles on the lawn, which had tiny covering – reminding me of antibodies rushing to attack a virus – hopefully symbolic of justice attacking the corrupt in the nation.)

The rain, we joked, was the washing away of the dirt, the old, the corrupt, of the system. A cleansing ritual necessary for the nation to wake up and wash out. It was refreshing. I lifted my face to the clouds and wondered whether God was testing us, or being humorous. Or whether the bomohs were doing their job to instead wash away the lawyers. Whichever the case, this was a momentous day. People travelled all the way from Penang, Melaka, for this.

The tide has turned. Paradigm shifts I hope. Little steps that will lead the walk to justice.

In Ambiga’s words, I hope our walk to justice will not be like Mandela’s “long walk to freedom”.

We must, we must, carry on the journey. Take the torch and pass it on. This is the message.

Other blogs’ stories, pictures and videos:

http://harismibrahim.wordpress.com/

http://www.malikimtiaz.blogspot.com/

http://rockybru.blogspot.com/

www.malaysiakini.com (of course)

Posted in The Cause | 5 Comments

A Datuk here, there and everywhere

My 3rd instalment at Bolehland’s website so far…

A Datuk here, there and everywhere

Close your eyes, throw a stone, and you will hit a dozen datuks with ease.  

Titles and honorifics were introduced in feudal Britain to address lords and their wives. Today, these are only used in classical literature and in addressing royalty in Britain.  

Not to be outdone, Malaysia has a long history of giving titles and honorifics to significant individuals.  

In an attempt to simplify the elaborate lists of titles, one can truly be confounded. In short, the main categories are, in ascending order, Dato’ or Datuk (State and Federal titles respectively), Tan Sri and Tun. These titles are given when awards are conferred (SSM, SMN, PJN, PSD).  

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 5 Comments

Was Jesus Political?

Here is what I said on Saturday at the inaugural dialogue and launch of OHMSI (Oriental Hearts and Mind Study Institute)… on the topic of Was Jesus Political?

I am usually asked to speak on panel discussions for one of two reasons; one, because I am a lady, and two, because I am young. I am here to celebrate these two attributes today, and hope that I may add value through a third element, namely the fact that I have been somewhat exposed to the socio-political fabric of Malaysia while working at the Centre for Public Policy Studies that works on public policy issues, and draw connections between the dots of religion and public life.   

As a young person fresh out of Churchianity, the reasons compelling me to work in public policy had little or nothing to do with my faith. This was the sad reality. It is only such interaction with a small but steadily growing group of Christians that has maintained the respect I have for the dignity and honour of the church, which may otherwise have withered away, along with many other activists who have experienced a great disconnect between their Christianity and social action. Further, the support they receive from their fellow Christian family has been insignificant, if at all.

Continue reading

Posted in Religion, The Cause, Theology | 5 Comments

Pa-Tri-Ot

My second article on Bolehland’s website…

Pa-tri-ot
(noun; One who loves, supports, defends one’s country)

My Merdeka weekend was spent in the quiet, sleepy town of Taiping. Here, even here, the call to show significant allegiance to the nation’s 50th birthday of independence seemed to be taken heed of. In fact, more cars had flags flapping away in the wind that I had recalled seeing back in Kuala Lumpur. One zealously strapped on 55 Malaysian flags (not counting the stickers pasted all round the windows nor the flag-jersey hanging inside) in commemoration of our Golden Age.

It reminded me of a survey reported about some time ago, that tried to determine what being a “Malaysian” was, really. In the survey, some elements that made up a true “Malaysian” were as follows: 1. Speaking the national language, Malay; 2. Living in the country Malaysia itself; 3. Flying the flag or celebrating Independence Day. I wondered silently whether any or all of these elements were necessary classifications of a true Malaysian. And further, whether or not a “true Malaysian” really exists. If so, who is given the jurisdiction to judge or determine its elements?

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Meme Integrasi Kaum

I’m just copying Bob Kee’s statement on his blog, but this is an interesting project. 🙂

Saya telah ditagkan oleh sahabat saya Bob Kee untuk mengambil bahagian didalam rantaian Tag Integrasi Kaum.

Rantaian tag ini bertujuan untuk memperkukuhkan integrasi kaum di Malaysia.

Setiap orang yang kena Tag dikehendaki hanya mengetag 2 orang, satu orang dari kaum sendiri, satu orang dari kaum lain.

Sebagai contoh, jika orang Cina dikenakan tag, dia hendaklah mengetag 1 orang Cina, dan lagi satu orang bukan Cina, iaitu India atau Melayu

Tugasanya amat mudah, hanya buat pautan ke URL 2 pemblog itu , nyatakan huraian sedikit.

Oleh itu saya ingin mengetag:-

(Oops, that’s three)

Di harap tag ini kekal dalam BM.

Saya juga ingin memberikan sedikit pendapat mengenai integrasi kaum.

Salah satu prasyarat yang saya yakin perlu untuk mewujudkan integrasi kaum yang tulin dan bermakna adalah kesaksamaan diantara kaum; samada dari segi hak ataupun sosio-ekonomi, dan kesedaran sejagat bahawa kita berkongsi satu takdir sebagai sebahagian daripada gagasan yang dikenali sebagai Malaysia ini.

Posted in The Cause | 1 Comment

Young Writers’ Camp 2007

I just returned from a Young Writers’ Camp, where I gave a workshop on blogging. This bunch of youths are highly intellectual and ask good questions. It makes me inspired and encouraged that there are so many young people out there who really do want to write to make a difference (or at least I hope).

I said the following, during my session…

I said that when we blog, we must remember the fact that we have a public audience out there. That is the basic premise. I encouraged them to think of a particular theme for their blog, asking them Why they blog in the first place. There are millions of blogs out there, so why would theirs be any different?

I challenged them to do three things: 3I’s. In blogging, remember that the blog is merely a communication tool like any other writing tool. So the first is to have an Idea – like any piece of writing, you need to have a passion, a message, something urgent that you want to say to the world out there.

Secondly, blogs Interact with the other, interact with individuals around them and is a useful mechanism to receive feedback, criticisms and comments to the stuff they write. Use this to their advantage. Thirdly, blogs must Impact society in some way. Think of the people’s hearts you want to change. Writing for the public and the mass, how will it impact the reader as they go along?

The theme of the camp was writing to know self, God and others. I can account for the fact that writing changes who we are. We discover ourselves in the process. And for what purpose God made us. And how we can help others to do the same.

The best thing you can do in life is to inspire. -Bob Dylan.

Posted in The Cause | 3 Comments

Jeffrey Sachs

This has been quite a period of celebrity speakers coming to Kuala Lumpur. August Merdeka month, mah.. lots of big names turning up at our doorstep, leaving but a shadow behind when September, October and November creep up towards us.

Jeffrey Sachs, head of the Earth Institute at Columbia University and advisor for the Millennium Development Goals, came to speak at an Economic Planning Unit (EPU) event last week. He spoke very highly of Malaysia, stating that there is hardly any poverty left to take care of. There were some excellent points made, the fact that Malaysia needs to seriously consider building walkways and paths to cycle in the city, lest our public becomes fat and lazy driving around in cars alone. Also that we can be a good example to other countries.

However, I felt like he was glossing things over, definitely sugar-coating us for the successes we have had without much focus on how we can improve. I asked him a question, quoting from his very chapter in a book I am reading. He says the following.

A successful development strategy should include 3 components:

1. A time path of public investments suited to the national circumstances.

2. An economic policy framework to support private-sector economic activity.

3. A political framework to ensure the rule of law and macroeconomic stability.

I asked Jeffrey to analyse Malaysia based on these three criteria, especially with regards to No. 1 (seeing that Malaysia has spent a lot of its resource money on mega projects and big buildings) and to No. 3 (seeing that Malaysia still has issues with corruption and the increasing Gini coefficient/larger gap between the rich and the poor).

He swerved away my question completely and didn’t answer it! I was quite disappointed. But then again, he was in the hands of the Good Government that invited him over.  And yes, he is still an amazing developmental economist. Left of the centre, in the very least, and that puts him in my good books.

Posted in Economics | 4 Comments

Grameen Bank

A week ago I attended Khazanah Nasional’s talk No 2 by Mohd. Yunus from Grameen Bank, Bangladesh. He won the Nobel Prize in 2006 for his now world-famous Bank that lent out micro credit loans to poverty stricken communities, and has successfully transformed their lives. The story is mindblowing, amazingly revolutionary and completely turns traditional bankers on their heels.

Yunus talks about the banking system as one that should exist for the benefit of the poor. In his experience, he found it startlingly contrasting that the university should be beside the hardcore poor, and that despite all the knowledge amassed by the university, still professors had not figured out a way to help people out of poverty cycles.

He began by giving little tiny loans to families. Eventually they used this capital to improve their homes and lives. An interesting fact is that 96% of the loans are given to women. And the bank has a 99% repayment rate. Which is amazing. He is a hero. I hope many others follow his example to rethink the concept of profit, prosperity and the financial world. Profit should mean profit to the entire community, not just for the self or own company, because in the long run an entire generation benefits.

Posted in Outside Malaysia | 3 Comments

The Resource Curse

It’s been a week since I’ve returned from Bali. It was an amazing time, seeing the numerous representatives from Asia-Pacific countries sharing their stories with the others, on how resources in their respective countries have been exploited for either foreign or Government usage in the past decades.

The resources curse is just the term referred to when resource-rich nations are blessed with oil, minerals, gas, tin and so on, but because of corruption, money is channelled the wrong way to the hands of the people who misuse it.

The Publish What You Pay campaign started in the UK, and has grown to a coalition of more than 300 NGOs all around the world. The coalition calls on resource rich developing governments around the world to publish full details on the money it receives from companies on revenues. This usually takes place in the form of taxes, royalties and dividends.

Then the PWYP came up with an initiative called the EITI: Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative, which is something Governments can sign onto. This is a voluntary disclosure of accounts within the extractive industries. Countries like Ghana, Mongolia have already signed up to the EITI. Surprisingly, Malaysia being historically one of the countries that has engaged in extractive industry has not any inkling of these two initiatives.

The Malaysia team will be looking at starting something here, so watch this space. This is something I’m pretty excited about. In our country, the issue is not so much about disclosure of information TO the Government. Instead, it is about the transparency of precisely HOW the Government uses the money for national development – and this information is almost impossible to obtain.

In the meantime, I’ve also volunteered to be on the PWYP Asia-Pacific Working Group for its regional network. That means it’ll be easier for us Malaysians to get resources from our neighbour countries!

Posted in Outside Malaysia, The Cause | Leave a comment

Bolehland.com

Nat is as usual, the ever energetic guy. He’s gotten a few of us to come together on (yet) another website which will feature some regular “columnists” to contribute articles. I’m not sure how this differentiates itself from other existing websites, but anyways, here I am writing on it once a fortnight. They are quite random thoughts, I think, until I figure it will be on a particular topic.

Here is my first article since the inception of the website, which is http://bolehland.com

The (F)utility of Forums

Gathering a bunch of people together at the same place at the same time to discuss apparently important issues is a natural recipe for great empty talk, or great initiative for change, depending on the nature and focus of the particular conference. I have become increasingly disillusioned with the manner in which forums, seminars, summits, conventions, and conferences (you name it) are conducted. Many times participants end up leaving feeling a sense of hopelessness at the futility of such talk-shops.

Granted, the objectives of these numerous seminars vary widely. Let us examine each of these and examine to what extent they justify their ever having existed. I begin with the premise that all such gatherings do have a particular goal, failing which they do not deserve to be considered. Some barely make the mark.

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment